The 2025 NBA Draft cycle has delivered chaos, intrigue, and a lottery result that defied logic. The Dallas Mavericks, owners of a mere 1.8% chance to land the No. 1 pick, shocked the league by winning the Cooper Flagg sweepstakes, a franchise-altering twist after years of fallout from the Luka Dončić trade.
Now that the 2025 NBA Draft Combine – complete with measurements, athletic testing, drills, and 5-on-5 scrimmages – has wrapped up, the league’s front offices are recalibrating their draft boards ahead of June’s selection process.
Yet volatility reigns. International standouts like Joan Beringer, Ben Saraf and Noa Essengue, absent due to club commitments, face a critical June showcase in Treviso (Italy) as teams scramble to finalize boards ahead of the June 25 draft. Meanwhile, NIL’s shadow looms large, with seven-figure college offers tempting fringe prospects to spurn the pros.
Today, we break down post-Combine draft trajectories, prospect analysis, and the ripple effects of a lottery that’s already rewritten the offseason playbook.
NOTE: These rankings reflect the composite score of 10 mock drafts (ESPN, CBS Sports, The Athletic, Bleacher Report, Babcock Hoops, USA Today, NBAdraft.net, SB Nation and FTW) to get a feel for the overall consensus. It’s not our opinion. The New York Knicks have forfeited their 2025 second-round pick because of tampering.
Player statistics are as of May 20, 2025, for all prospects. International player statistics represent the cumulative averages across all competitions.
See a mistake, contact Cyro Asseo by clicking here.
Dallas: Cooper Flagg (Duke)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 6-8 | 7-0 WS | 221 LBS
Agent: CAA
2024-25 stats: 19.2 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.4 spg, 1.4 bpg, 48.1% FG, 38.5% 3P in 37 games
Cooper Flagg is the consensus top prospect in this draft, boasting elite two-way versatility, a 6-foot-8 frame with a 7-foot wingspan, and a relentless motor that makes him an immediate impact player. Offensively, he excels in transition (1.302 PPP), spot-up shooting, and cutting while showcasing strong playmaking (4.2 APG), though his isolation and pick-and-roll creation (0.875 PPP) remain works in progress. Defensively, his elite anticipation, length, and mobility (0.956 defensive PPP) allow him to guard multiple positions and disrupt passing lanes.
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “His defense is generational, I think the defense is solid. I believe his value as a player will show this year as he steps into the perfect situation. He won’t be asked to do too much, which places him in a great spot. However, people are acting like his generation is inferior and that he is the second-best player on the championship team.”
San Antonio: Dylan Harper (Rutgers)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2006 | 6’6 | 6’10 WS | 213 LBS
Best rank: 2 / Worst rank: 2
Agent: WME
2024-25 stats: 19.4 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 4.0 apg, 1.4 spg, 0.6 bpg, 48.4% FG, 33.3% 3P in 29 games
Harper, the son of five-time NBA champion Ron Harper and younger brother of Pistons guard Ron Harper Jr., is widely projected as the No. 2 pick behind Cooper Flagg. His elite basketball IQ, advanced playmaking, and well-rounded scoring make him an immediate offensive engine, excelling in transition (1.256 PPS) and as a spot-up shooter (45% on catch-and-shoot attempts). While his pull-up three-point shooting (29.2%) needs improvement and lacks elite burst. However, his crafty footwork and change-of-pace game help him finish efficiently at the rim (67.6% FG). Defensively, his 6-foot-6, 213-pound frame and 6-10.5 wingspan allow him to guard multiple positions, though his consistency on that end remains a work in progress.
San Antonio already has De’Aaron Fox and Castle in the backcourt, making a potential selection of Dylan Harper a luxury, given his offensive upside there isn’t another choice besides trading the pick for a superstar like Giannis Antetokounmpo.
“We’ve got to keep adding high-level talent, you look at the teams still playing, and it’s high-level talent, and then you put the complimentary pieces around them,” Spurs general manager Brian Wright said to HoopsHype on how they plan to build going forward. “We feel like we’ve got a great young group. Stephen just won Rookie of the Year, so we’re excited about that. To get the second pick, it adds to that.”
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “I don’t think he has a higher ceiling than Cooper Flagg, but I believe he can be just as good. He has that slow-fast style that Jalen Brunson possesses, which I think is one of the most interesting things about him. The way he can dictate the game is impressive. At six-six, he has great size for his position and can play either shooting guard or point guard. From what I’ve seen of him at Rutgers, he does a good job of attacking smaller defenders. Granted, most of the defenders he faces are smaller than him, but I thought he showcased his ability to go at them effectively.”
Philadelphia: Ace Bailey (Rutgers)
Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 6-7 | 7-0 WS | 202 LBS
Best rank: 3 / Worst rank: 7
Agent: Lifestyle
2024-25 stats: 17.6 ppg, 7.2 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.0 spg, 1.3 bpg, 46.0% FG, 34.6% 3P in 30 games
Bailey blends elite size with a smooth shooting stroke (34.6% 3P on 5.1 attempts) and explosive transition scoring (1.258 PPP, 91st percentile). While his raw numbers and off-ball movement shine, his shot selection is erratic –over-relying on contested mid-range jumpers and struggling to create separation off the dribble due to a high handle and slight frame.
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “The shot selection at Rutgers last year left a lot to be desired. Part of that is because he played on a bad team and had to take a lot of tough shots. But when they asked him about shot selection during the pre-draft interviews, he said, ‘Well, I work on those shots, so they’re not really bad shots to me.’ I don’t know if that’s true. Especially since he’s six-seven and not six-ten anymore, he’s really going to have to show that he’s made strides as a playmaker. One assist per game isn’t going to cut it. I know he was on a bad team, but that’s just not going to cut it.”
Charlotte: VJ Edgecombe (Baylor)
Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2005 | 6-5 | 6-7 WS | 193 LBS
Best rank: 3 / Worst rank: 4
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 3.2 apg, 2.1 spg, 0.6 bpg, 43.6% FG, 34.0% 3P in 33 games
With LaMelo Ball at point guard, Miles Bridges and Brandon Miller at forward, and Mark Williams at center, Charlotte can add to its young core from a bevy of swingmen, including VJ Edgecombe, Tre Johnson, or Kon Knueppel.
Edgecombe is one of the most electrifying two-way guards in this draft, combining elite athleticism, defensive intensity, and transition explosiveness that immediately translate to NBA play. His 6-foot-5, 193-pound frame and 6-foot-7.5 wingspan allow him to lock down opposing guards while contributing across the box score. Offensively, he thrives as a slasher and spot-up shooter (1.144 PPP), though his three-point consistency and left-hand finishing need improvement to maximize his offensive impact. Defensively, he’s already NBA-ready – disruptive in passing lanes, switchable in coverages, and capable of guarding multiple positions with his quickness and instincts.
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “Jumps out of the gym, an athleticism special that you can fly, but his defense is special. I think VJ is better [than Ace]. He’s a better playmaker, his shot is better, and he’s better defensively, which means he can contribute from day one type stuff. Long-term, I just think there’s more upside, and I think he can at least be like a solid role player with ace potential.”
Utah: Tre Johnson (Texas)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2006 | 6-6 | 6-10 WS | 190 LBS
Best rank: 5 / Worst rank: 9
Agent: WME
2024-25 stats: 19.9 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 2.7 apg, 0.9 spg, 0.3 bpg, 42.7% FG, 39.7% 3P in 33 games
Johnson projects as one of the top scoring guards in this class, combining a polished offensive arsenal with advanced footwork, a high release, and deep shooting range. With a 6-foot-10 wingspan, Johnson is a tough shotmaker at all three levels. He thrives as a spot-up shooter (1.259 PPP), is dangerous in transition and off-the-catch, and shows confidence pulling up from NBA range, leveraging his off-ball movement and understanding of spacing to find soft spots and punish late closeouts. Johnson’s handle and creativity help him generate separation in iso sets, and his shooting gravity consistently draws defensive attention, opening up opportunities for teammates.
While his shot selection can get streaky and he struggles to finish through contact, Johnson’s ability to score off movement, relocate, and hit high-difficulty jumpers makes him a natural fit for modern NBA offenses built around pace and space. Defensively, he’s still developing, occasionally losing focus off the ball and providing inconsistent help, but his upside as an elite movement shooter with three-level scoring potential will have teams in the Top 10 betting on his shotmaking and upside as a primary or secondary scoring threat.
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “He is a bucket. That’s what I will say: he is a bucket. He might be the best pure scorer in the draft. What about him? He’s shooting around 40% from three-point range, something like that. He’s close to that – he gets to his spot really well; I don’t see that changing against NBA defenders.”
Washington: Jeremiah Fears (Oklahoma)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 6’4 | 6’5 WS | 179 LBS
Best rank: 5 / Worst rank: 8
Agent: LIFT
2024-25 stats: 17.1 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 4.1 apg, 1.6 spg, 0.1 bpg, 43.4% FG, 28.4% 3P in 34 games
The Wizards mathematical worst-case scenario occurred as they fell to the sixth pick. With Washington projected for another lottery season they will target either a future floor general like Jeremiah Fears (or Kasparas Jakucionis) or a big to pair with Alex Sarr.
Fears is one of the draft’s high-upside, creative lead guards with elite slashing instincts and advanced ball-handling for his age. He thrives as a dynamic rim attacker, boasting a 56.4% mark inside the arc and a 64.0% scoring rate as a pick-and-roll ball handler, using his explosive first step, change of pace, and deceleration to create separation and finish with creativity around the rim. He’s highly effective in the midrange and on floaters, and he consistently draws contact to earn trips to the stripe. While Fears flashes some playmaking ability in motion, his decision-making can be erratic, leading to a high turnover rate and stretches of forced “hero ball” play. His three-point shooting remains a swing skill (28.4%), and he tends to settle for difficult pull-ups and can disappear off the ball in halfcourt sets.
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “With Fears, you have a modern-day big point guard. However, he’s not a true facilitator; his average is around 4 assists, something like that. And how does that translate to the NBA? He’s just not a good shooter, which worries me. Is it that bad, or does it look like it could be fixable? Maybe, but he was below 30% from three.”
New Orleans: Kon Knueppel (Duke)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2005 | 6-6 | 6-6 WS | 219 LBS
Best rank: 3 / Worst rank: 10
Agent: Priority
2024-25 stats: 14.4 ppg, 4.0 rpg, 2.7 apg, 1.0 spg, 0.2 bpg, 47.9% FG, 40.6% 3P in 39 games
Kon Knueppel stands out as one of the most polished shooters in this draft and a versatile offensive game that translates seamlessly to the NBA. At 6-foot-6 with a strong 219-pound frame, he thrives as a movement shooter (1.169 PPP off screens) and spot-up threat (1.385 PPP), while his high IQ and secondary playmaking (2.7 apg, low turnovers) add value as a connective passer. Defensively, he competes with physicality (0.782 PPP allowed, 80th percentile) but lacks elite lateral quickness, occasionally struggling against quicker guards and ball screens.
It’s unclear how new executive Joe Dumars intends to use New Orleans Pelicans’ seventh pick to address their young frontcourt of Zion Williamson, Trey Murphy, Yves Missi and Herb Jones. Dejounte Murray expected to miss significant time with a torn right Achilles tendon, and CJ McCollum entering the final season of his contract at $30.67 million, will the Pelicans select a guard or simply take the best available talent?
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “He’s not as good defensively or as big as De’Andre Hunter, but I think he’s a better shooting version of him. Knueppel really impressed me during the Kansas game. He stepped up impressively, especially when he helped beat Cooper Flagg’s team. He showcased surprising ability, particularly in his ability to create his own shot. He’s much better off the dribble than people give him credit for. And obviously, you’re getting a lights-out shooter, but he’s more than just that. I think he’ll be better than great. Both he and Gradey Dick have similar body types; he’s not as skinny as Gradey but they’re comparable. Both are decent college scorers, but I have more faith in Knueppel’s ability to translate that to the next level. I think he contributes more than Gradey does in other aspects of the game. He’s a little thicker than Gradey, which helps him defensively. Grady was a really good rebounder, but as pros, being a good rebounder doesn’t always fall on your shoulders.”
Brooklyn: Khaman Maluach (Duke)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 7-2 | 7-6 WS | 252 LBS
Best rank: 5 / Worst rank: 17
Agent: Klutch
2024-25 stats: 8.6 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 0.5 apg, 0.2 spg, 1.3 bpg, 71.2% FG, 25.0% 3P in 39 games
Khaman Maluach has elite physical tools and impressive mobility for his size. His rim-running and finishing ability are already NBA-caliber (72.3% FG, 1.759 PPP as roll man), and he shows flashes of defensive upside (1.3 bpg in just 21 mpg) with his shot-blocking instincts and switchability. However, his rawness is evident – limited offensive feel, inconsistent defensive positioning (0.952 PPP allowed), and an underdeveloped jumper (25% 3P) leave room for growth. While not yet a dominant rebounder, his physical tools, motor, and pick-and-roll dominance make him a high-upside project.
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “I love Maluach. His ability, for a guy who’s about 7-foot-2 or whatever he is, is nuts. He runs the floor really well. He’s super raw, obviously. He’s not the most skilled player, and he’s probably not going to set the world on fire. He didn’t even average in a place like college, but what he does is always valuable. Rim-running, shot-blocking bigs. He runs the floor really well. He’s okay in drop coverage and in the pick-and-roll; he’s not going to be left on an island out there. I don’t know how much more he can develop. I think that’s probably where he’s at. He might be stuck as a putback guy. But again, being a putback and lob threat is great. You can be like Dereck Lively in that regard, right? That’s what he reminds me of. Dereck Lively was just a rim-running, putback big.”
Toronto: Derik Queen (Maryland)
Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2004 | 6’10 | 7’1 WS | 247 LBS
Best rank: 6 / Worst rank: 18
Agent: WME
2024-25 stats: 16.5 ppg, 9.0 rpg, 1.9 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.1 bpg, 52.6% FG, 20.0% 3P in 36 games
Toronto will have some frontcourt decisions to make this offseason whether to extend center Jakob Poeltl, and if they’ll re-sign Chris Boucher.
A rookie big man such as Derik Queen or Maluach could make sense for Toronto.
Queen is a skilled big man that has showcased advanced footwork, soft touch, and impressive playmaking for his size. With a near 7-foot-1 wingspan, he dominates as a post scorer (0.918 PPP) and midrange shooter (46.4%), while his high IQ shines in dribble handoffs and offensive initiations. Defensively, he contests well without fouling and shows switchability, though his limited shot-blocking and occasional lapses raise concerns. While his rebounding and physicality are strengths, his lack of explosiveness (0.681 PPP as roll man) and shaky perimeter shooting could cap his upside.
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “Derik Queen is skilled, big, and has a decent body. But if he’s turning 21, how much better is he actually going to get? Those crucial years of development from 19 to 21, when you’re in the league, are vital for improving your jumper, getting faster, and enhancing your offensive game. He missed out on that because he was in high school and college. I don’t want to sound negative – I really like Derik Queen, and I want him to succeed. He’s probably one of my favorite freshmen to watch this year. However, his age and limited upside are a little concerning. He’s definitely a high-floor guy.”
Houston: Kasparas Jakucionis (Illinois)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 6-6 | 6-7.5 WS | 205 LBS
Best rank: 9 / Worst rank: 12
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 15.0 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 4.7 apg, 0.9 spg, 0.3 bpg, 44.0% FG, 31.8% 3P in 33 games
Kasparas Jakucionis is a top guard prospect in this draft, combining elite playmaking with excellent size and offensive versatility. The Illinois freshman showcased advanced floor vision and pick-and-roll mastery (0.934 PPP as ball-handler, 65th percentile), operating as a primary initiator while maintaining efficient decision-making (1.073 PPP in isolation). His ability to play both on and off-ball adds valuable lineup flexibility, though his inconsistent three-point shooting and modest transition production (0.568 PPP) currently limit his ceiling. Defensively, he uses his length well (0.867 PPP allowed) but lacks elite quickness, raising questions about his ability to contain NBA guards. While not an explosive athlete, his high basketball IQ, international experience, and well-rounded skill set make him a strong lottery candidate for teams seeking a big, creative guard who can develop into a starting-caliber playmaker.
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “Kasparas is the real deal. This is another classic example of a combo point guard. Look, Tyrese Haliburton is still who I love to compare him to. The difference between Kasparas and Jeremiah is that I have fewer doubts about Kasparas’s playmaking ability at the professional level. He gets to the line pretty well; maybe that’s just because he’s a big point guard going up against smaller defenders in college, but I’m a big fan of his. Plus, he comes from Lithuania, which adds another layer to his skill set. It wouldn’t shock me if he ends up being the best out of the three guards after Harper.”
More: Kasparas Jakucionis: NBA draft scouting report and intel
Portland: Collin Murray-Boyles (South Carolina)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2005 | 6-7 | 7-0 WS | 239 LBS
Best rank: 7 / Worst rank: 24
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 16.8 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 2.4 apg, 1.5 spg, 1.3 bpg, 58.6% FG, 26.5% 3P in 32 games
Portland will probably look frontcourt help as Deandre Ayton ($35.55 million) and Robert Williams ($13.29 million) are entering the final season of their contracts. Among frontcourt prospects, Collin Murray-Boyles is intriguing with his elite interior efficiency (1.085 PPP, 90th percentile) and defensive versatility that translates to modern NBA lineups. The South Carolina sophomore dominates as a paint playmaker (63.0% 2P, 1.133 PPP post-ups) and relentless rebounder (9.2 RPG), while his defensive mobility (0.533 PPP isolation defense) and active hands (2.9 steals per 100 possessions) allow him to switch onto perimeter players.
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “My whole thing with Colin Murray-Boyles was that I thought he was great value if you got him outside the lottery because I think he could be the Ryan Dunn of this draft class. However, if you take him in the lottery, that value diminishes; it’s just not the same. I think he can be a productive player right away, but again, he’s a limited-upside guy. He’s a two-year guy, and his body type is not going to change. There will always be places for guys like him – those tweeners. But the Rockets and Portland are the only two lottery teams where it makes sense to take a swing on him because they need that position, and what he does would fit their style. He has the ability to guard multiple positions and is a great rebounder. He can play power forward on a team with players like Donovan Clingan or Alperen Sengun.”
More: Collin Murray-Boyles: NBA draft scouting report and intel
Chicago: Noa Essengue (Ratiopharm Ulm)
2006 | 6-9 | 7-0 WS | 194 LBS
Best rank: 9 / Worst rank: 20
Agent: LIFT
2024-25 stats: 10.4 ppg, 1.1 apg, 4.9 rpg, 0.6 bpg, 0.9 spg, 51.0% FG, 22.5% 3P in 40 games this season
Centers Nikola Vucevic and Zach Collins, are set to enter the final season of their deals worth $21.48 million and $18.08 million deal entering next season. One potential draft prospect who could be a fit for the Bulls alongside Matas Buzelis and is worth keeping an eye on is Frechman forward Noa Essengue.
Essengue boasts elite athleticism, a 7-0 wingspan, and impressive mobility for a forward. The 18-year-old French prospect (second-youngest in the class) shows tantalizing potential as a transition weapon (1.467 PPP, 93rd percentile) and explosive finisher (68.7% at rim), while his defensive versatility allows him to switch across multiple positions. While still raw offensively, Essengue has shown recent growth as a shooter (35% 3P since January) and plays with an infectious motor that translates to rebounds (4.9 RPG) and defensive playmaking (1.5 combined steals/blocks). However, his game remains unpolished – inconsistent shooting mechanics, limited creation skills (0.862 PPP spot-ups), and defensive lapses (1.029 PPP allowed) currently cap his impact.
An international scout told HoopsHype: “Noa Essengue is a name you have to mention just for how wild it is, but he’s also a really good athlete with clear physical tools. He had a great preseason showing against the Blazers, and by the end of the year, he started to hit some threes after struggling earlier. I do like the late-season shooting splits, but I don’t know how much to trust the sample size. He has tools you can’t teach – athleticism, ground coverage, and the ability to rebound. But I worry about his ball skills – he might have trouble with physicality at the NBA level, and I’m not sure he has the skill set to play on the wing. He’s probably one of the lightest forwards in the league to start, so he’ll need to get stronger and develop more skill to take advantage of mismatches. At the end of the day, it’s about whether he can stick as a versatile defender who covers ground, but there are definite questions about his offensive fit.”
Atlanta: Egor Demin (BYU)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2006 | 6-10 | 6-10 WS | 199 LBS
Best rank: 8 / Worst rank: 21
Agent: BDA
2024-25 stats: 10.6 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 5.5 apg, 1.2 spg, 0.4 bpg, 41.2% FG, 27.3% 3P in 33 games
Atlanta’s draft outlook is unclear as the Hawks continue to go through the search process for a potential president over current general manager Onsi Saleh. Extension talks with four-time All-Star Trae Young loom this summer, and backup guard Kobe Bufkin has struggled to stay healthy.
Egor Demin is a 6-foot-10 point guard (or forward) with elite playmaking instincts but a significantly streaky shooter. The Russian prospect dazzles with his court vision, particularly in transition (0.968 PPP) and late-clock situations (1.241 PPP ATO), while his defensive length and anticipation allow him to guard multiple positions. However, Demin’s lack of burst and physicality hinder his ability to create separation or finish through contact, resulting in poor halfcourt efficiency (0.775 PPP). While his late-season surge and tournament performances showed promise, his inconsistent shooting and passive scoring mentality raise concerns about his offensive ceiling.
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “Demin’s a wild card. If he falls past the top 10, someone’s getting a steal. He’s a 6-foot-10 passer with Josh Giddey vibes—maybe even a better athlete, though Giddey’s thicker. The shot’s the question: 28% from three in Europe, but he took them, which matters. If he’s willing to fire the three in the NBA, he’s intriguing. If not, he’s just a tall playmaker. His floor? Giddey on the Thunder – a point-forward who gets hidden defensively. His ceiling? A shooting Giddey, which is a real weapon.”
San Antonio: Carter Bryant (Arizona)
Arizona Wildcats Athletics
2005 | 6-8 | 7-0 WS | 214 LBS
Best rank: 12 / Worst rank: 25
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 6.5 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.0 apg, 0.9 spg, 1.0 bpg, 46.0% FG, 37.1% 3P in 37 games
If the Spurs keep both lottery picks they could look to draft a safe, high-floor contributor with the upside to grow into a premium role player here. Carter Bryant is one of the “3-and-D” prospects, an ideal modern forward build (6-foot-8, 7-foot wingspan) and two-way efficiency that should translate immediately. After a slow start at Arizona, the freshman showcased his value as a low-usage, high-impact contributor – shooting 37.1% from deep while demonstrating elite defensive playmaking (2.8 steals + 2.9 blocks per 100 possessions). His combination of length, quick-twitch closing speed, and defensive versatility allowed him to match up against elite wings like Cooper Flagg, though his tendency to foul remains an area for improvement.
Offensively, Bryant’s game is currently limited – his handle restricts self-creation, and he’ll need to expand his shot diet beyond spot-ups and cuts. However, his smooth shooting stroke, high basketball IQ, and underrated passing suggest he can thrive as a connector in an NBA rotation. While he may never develop into a high-usage scorer, his archetype – a switchable wing with size, shooting, and defensive instincts – is among the most coveted in the league.
An NBA exec told HoopsHype: “Bryant’s the perfect late-lottery flier for a playoff team. Six-eight, 40% from three, with defensive versatility. He’s not a full-time four yet, but he’s got PJ Washington potential: stretch the floor in small lineups, attack closeouts, and grow into a combo forward. OKC at 15? Ideal. Let him thrive off the bench like he did at Arizona, where his minutes spike coincided with their mid-season turnaround.”
Oklahoma City: Nolan Traoré (Saint-Quentin)
Faugere/Presse Sports via Imagn Images
Best rank: 9 / Worst rank: 28
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 11.7 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 4.8 apg, 0.7 spg, 0.1 bpg, 40.2% FG, 29.2% 3P in 38 games this season.
An international scout told HoopsHype: “This is what I was going to say; at the beginning of the year in league play, he looked very much like Killian Hayes. However, in the final month or six-week stretch at the end of the year, he became a near 40% three-point shooter, I think it was around 38%. I know he’s a phenomenal pick-and-roll ball handler in terms of execution and facilitation, but I don’t see him as a pure floor general. At the same time, I don’t see off-guard ability either. The shooting seems to be the big factor, and if he’s not able to shoot, he could turn into a sort of Killian Hayes 2.0—definitely less strong, but there are some similarities. I’m not particularly fond of that comparison, though. Personally, I wouldn’t put him in the lottery, but I don’t think he’s too far from it. I’d be surprised if he falls much past 20, but he could certainly go ahead of that.”
Orlando: Asa Newell (Georgia)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2005 | 6’11 | 7’0 WS | 223 LBS
Best rank: 10 / Worst rank: 25
Agent: Excel
2024-25 stats: 15.4 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 0.9 apg, 1.0 spg, 1.0 bpg, 54.3% FG, 29.2% 3P in 33 games
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “Newell’s a project. Think stiff Nic Claxton with better offense but worse defense. If you draft him as a five who can shoot, fine. If you think he’s a four who’ll develop a shot, that’s risky. His foot speed is a problem in space, but he’s a smart weak-side rim protector. Long-term, at worst he’s a backup big who might be a starter if the shot comes around.”
Minnesota: Jase Richardson (Michigan State)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2005 | 6-3 | 6-6 WS | 178 LBS
Best rank: 12 / Worst rank: 26
Agent: CAA
2024-25 stats: 12.1 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 1.9 apg, 0.8 spg, 0.3 bpg, 49.3% FG, 41.2% 3P in 36 games
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “Jase is stuck in that tweener purgatory – 6-foot-1 with a scorer’s mentality but not quite a point guard, not quite a shooting guard. The shot is legit, but he’s an average athlete who won’t blow by NBA defenders. Here’s the thing – he was forced into playmaking at MSU when their backcourt got thin, and that’s not his game. At the next level, he’s strictly a movement shooter who can attack closeouts.”
Washington: Liam McNeeley (Connecticut)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2005 | 6’7 | 6’8 WS | 214 LBS
Best rank: 14 / Worst rank: 24
Agent: CAA
2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 6.0 rpg, 2.3 apg, 0.6 spg, 0.2 bpg, 38.1% FG, 31.7% 3P in 27 games
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “McNeeley’s catch-and-shoot numbers are legit, but UConn misused him as a facilitator after injuries wrecked their backcourt. He’s a pure wing. Excellent off screens, decent defensively, zero creation. In the right system, he’s a 10-year rotation player. I see his NBA role very similar to Corey Kispert‘s.”
Brooklyn: Nique Clifford (Colorado State)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2002 | 6-6 | 6-8 WS | 202 LBS
Best rank: 13 / Worst rank: 24
Agent: Life Sports
2024-25 stats: 18.9 ppg, 9.6 rpg, 4.4 apg, 1.2 spg, 0.6 bpg, 49.6% FG, 37.7% 3P in 36 games
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “He’s an amazing rebounding guard and a great shooter, right? You know, he’s going to be your Aaron Wiggins. He’s a great player, and we’re going to be a great team. Maybe not as good, but definitely a better rebounder than Wiggins, honestly. I would say he is. He’s got good size for a guard, too – like 6-foot-6, 200 lbs – not too bad at all Yeah, in college, watching Colorado State, when Nique decided that he wanted to get downhill, get to the rim, and take over a game, nobody could guard him. Nobody in the Mountain West could stay in front of him. He was like the second-best player in the Mountain West last year.”
Miami: Thomas Sorber (Georgetown)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2005 | 6’10 | 7’6 WS | 262 LBS
Best rank: 10 / Worst rank: 28
Agent: WME
2024-25 stats: 14.5 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 2.4 apg, 1.5 spg, 2.0 bpg, 53.2% FG, 16.2% 3P in 24 games
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “Sorber’s a tank, 6-foot-10, 260 lbs, 7-foot-7 wingspan. High-floor. Steven Adams with less mass. He’ll set bone-crushing screens, rebound, and defend in drop. Perfect for Dallas or New Orleans as a backup five. Just don’t ask him to switch.”
Utah: Danny Wolf (Michigan)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2004 | 7-0 | 7-2 WS | 251 LBS
Best rank: 15 / Worst rank: 37
Agent: CAA
2024-25 stats: 13.2 ppg, 9.7 rpg, 3.6 apg, 0.7 spg, 1.4 bpg, 49.7% FG, 33.6% 3P in 37 games
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “I love Danny but Wolf’s become overrated in the media. He put up Yale numbers at Michigan, but his defense is bad. Gets cooked in space, can’t guard fives. The passing and shooting are nice, but he’s a zero at times on the offensive glass. Likely a backup stretch five who gets played off the floor in playoffs.”
Atlanta: Will Riley (Illinois)
Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2005 | 6-8 | 6-9 WS | 185 LBS
Best rank: 16 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Klutch
2024-25 stats: 12.6 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 2.2 apg, 0.3 spg, 0.3 bpg, 43.2% FG, 32.6% 3P in 35 games
An assistant coach told HoopsHype: “Riley’s stock is rising because teams aren’t viewing him as just a guard anymore. He’s a wing, maybe even a small-ball four long-term. At 6-foot-9 with a plus wingspan, he’s got the size to defend multiple positions, and his slashing/cutting is elite. The jumper improved drastically over the season, but he’s not a creator yet. The Illinois tape is telling: when he got more minutes mid-season, their offense stabilized.”
Indiana: Rasheer Fleming (St. Joseph’s)
Photo by Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2004 | 6’9 | 7’5 WS | 232 LBS
Best rank: 13 / Worst rank: 30
Agent: Klutch
2024-25 stats: 14.7 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.4 spg, 1.5 bpg, 53.1% FG, 39.0% 3P in 35 games
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “Fleming’s my sleeper. Imagine a freakishly long, more athletic Ryan Anderson. 40% from three on low volume, but a menace defensively. He’s a smart cutter, decent team defender, and underrated rebounder. Mid-to-late first-round teams needing shooting should take him. He’ll contribute year one.”
Oklahoma City: Joan Beringer (Cedevita Olimpija)
ABA League – Filip Barbalic
2006 | 6-11 | 7-3 WS | 230 LBS
Best rank: 13 / Worst rank: 40
Agent: Wasserman
2024-25 stats: 4.9 ppg, 4.6 rpg, 0.4 apg, 0.5 spg, 1.4 bpg, 61.0% FG, 0.0% 3P in 57 games
An international scout told HoopsHype: “Joan Beringer is a giant who moves really well for his size. He covers ground, protects the rim, and brings upside as an energy big who runs the floor and crashes the glass. But offensively, he’s just so far away from contributing to winning. Right now, he’s basically a rim-running big who gets putbacks and lobs, but how much does that move the needle? If he’s not doing much on offense, it’s tough to justify the minutes, even if he brings defensive value. It’s like the Andre Roberson situation. At a certain point, if teams don’t have to guard you, it can kill your offense, no matter what you do on defense. That’s the big concern with Beringer long-term.”
Orlando: Walter Clayton Jr. (Florida)
Michael Reaves/Getty Images
2003 | 6-3 | 6-4 WS | 199 LBS
Best rank: 16 / Worst rank: 32
Agent: Klutch
2024-25 stats: 18.3 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.2 spg, 0.5 bpg, 44.8% FG, 38.6% 3P in 39 games
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “Walter is a 6-foot-1 combo guard with one elite skill: shooting. He’s not a true point guard, but he’s got Patty Mills upside. A bench sniper who can run occasional pick-and-roll. If his handle tightens, maybe he’s a poor man’s Fred VanVleet. But realistically? He’s a late first, early second-rounder who’ll stick as a specialist.”
More: Walter Clayton Jr: NBA draft scouting report and intel
Brooklyn: Noah Penda (Le Mans)
Daniel Derajinski/Icon Sport via Getty Images
2005 | 6-8 | 6-11 WS | 225 LBS
Best rank: 16 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: 360
2024-25 stats: 9.9 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 2.7 apg, 1.2 spg, 0.9 bpg, 43.4% FG, 31.8% 3P in 29 games
An international scout told HoopsHype: “Noah Penda is one of the biggest sleepers in this class. I thought he’d have started climbing boards by now. He has the physical attributes, he’s incredibly strong with some ball skills, and the shot is coming along. What stands out is his aggressiveness as a defender and that requisite playmaking ability. He’s a tank, and you notice the impact right away. He got valuable playing time overseas, and you can see he’s learning to use his strength and athleticism. He may never be a star, but he feels like someone who will stick in a rotation.”
Brooklyn: Ben Saraf (Ratiopharm Ulm)
Harry Langer/DeFodi Images via Getty Images
2006 | 6-6 | 6-7.5 WS | 201 LBS
Best rank: 19 / Worst rank: 41
Agent: CAA
2024-25 stats: 12.1 ppg, 2.6 rpg, 4.3 apg, 1.1 spg, 0.3 bpg, 45.3% FG, 28.7% 3P in 44 games
An international scout told HoopsHype: “My worry is his ability to break down the first line of defense and punish switches. Does he have the athleticism to be a lead guard in the NBA, and is he a good enough shooter to play off the ball? To me, he’s more of a secondary creator because of that lack of burst. He wins more with size, pace, and craft than with top-end explosiveness. There are some of the same issues you see with Traore. He doesn’t quite check the boxes as a lead or an off-ball guy, but you like the size and feel.”
Boston: Yaxel Lendeborg (UAB)
Jeff Haynes/NBAE via Getty Images
2002 | 6-9 | 7-4 WS | 234 LBS
Best rank: 23 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Octagon
2024-25 stats: 17.7 ppg, 11.4 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.7 spg, 1.8 bpg, 52.2% FG, 35.7% 3P in 37 games
A pro scout told HoopsHype: “Lendeborg’s the mid-major darling. Led UAB in points, rebounds, and assists. A 6-foot-9 Swiss Army knife. That’s not supposed to happen with mid-major bigs. He’s got this old-man game. Not explosive, but smart as hell with a 7-foot-4 wingspan that lets him play bigger. Defensively? You can switch him onto guards in a pinch, and he’ll battle centers on the block.”
Phoenix: Hugo Gonzalez (Real Madrid)
Borja B. Hojas/Getty Images
2003 | 6-6 | 6-8 WS | 205 LBS
Best rank: 22 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: ProMondo
2024–25 stats: 3.2 ppg, 1.7 rpg, 0.5 apg, 0.2 spg, 0.3 bpg, 41.1% FG, 29.4% 3P in 59 games
An international scout told HoopsHype: “Hugo Gonzalez is a good athlete who brings energy, perimeter defense, and the ability to finish around the basket. But there are big questions about his shooting, handle, and decision-making. He’s the kind of guy who probably ends up as a late first- or early second-round pick. Someone you bring in for energy and defensive potential but you don’t want to bet on as a primary option.”
LA Clippers: Cedric Coward (Duke)
David Banks-Imagn Images
2003 | 6-6 | 7-2 WS | 213 LBS
Best rank: 16 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Life Sports Agency
2024–25 stats: 17.7 ppg, 7.0 rpg, 3.7 apg, 0.8 spg, 1.7 bpg, 55.7% FG, 40.0% 3P, 84.0% FT in 6 games
An NBA scout told HoopsHype: “He was basically a lock to go back to college until about a month ago. He only played six games last year, so he didn’t have much experience. But when he was on the court at Eastern Washington, he really stood out—he has a great build and is an excellent shooter. In fact, at Washington State, especially early in the season, they looked like a potentially dangerous team thanks to Cedric Coward’s strong play. He was impressive enough to be named a playmaker this year, even with such a small sample size.
Unfortunately, he got hurt, and the team’s season really struggled after that. With only those six games played, his upside isn’t as high as some other prospects. But if you want a guy who can come in right away and contribute, Cedric Coward will be that player. If you’re picking late in the first round, at the 20s he can help your team. I think he’s climbing into the top 20 picks at this point. I’ve heard he has a three-million-dollar offer from Duke, so if he’s forgoing that, it likely means he believes he has a strong chance of going in the Top 20 or at least the Top 22, which suggests he could be making the same or more in the NBA. Initially, I thought he would return to college, but he’s climbing up the draft boards, so it looks like he might not.”
Minnesota: Labaron Philon (Alabama)
Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images
Best rank: 17 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: CAA
2024–25 stats: 10.6 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 3.8 apg, 1.4 spg, 0.3 bpg, 45.2% FG, 31.5% 3P in 37 games
Boston: Maxime Raynaud (Stanford)
Jim Dedmon-Imagn Images
Best rank: 26 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Comsport
2024–25 stats: 20.2 ppg, 10.6 rpg, 1.7 apg, 0.9 spg, 1.4 bpg, 46.7% FG, 34.5% 3P in 35 games
Charlotte: Adou Thiero (Arkansas)
Stephen Lew-Imagn Images
Best rank: 23 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Klutch
2024–25 stats: 15.1 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 1.9 apg, 1.6 spg, 0.7 bpg, 54.5% FG, 25.6% 3P in 27 games
Charlotte: Tahaad Pettiford (Auburn)
Bob Donnan-Imagn Images
Best rank: 21 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: WME
2024–25 stats: 11.6 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.0 apg, 0.2 spg, 0.9 bpg, 42.0% FG, 37.0% 3P in 38 games
Philadelphia: Ryan Kalkbrenner (Creighton)
Jordan Prather-USA TODAY Sports
Best rank: 30 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Priority
2024–25 stats: 19.2 ppg, 8.7 rpg, 1.5 apg, 0.5 spg, 2.7 bpg, 65.3% FG, 34.4% 3P in 35 games
Brooklyn: Drake Powell (North Carolina)
Jim Dedmon-Imagn Images
Best rank: 24 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: CAA
2024–25 stats: 7.4 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 1.1 apg, 0.7 spg, 0.7 bpg, 48.3% FG, 37.9% 3P in 37 games
Detroit: Bogoljub Markovic (Mega Basket)
David Damnjanovic/DeFodi Images via Getty Images
Best rank: 34 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Excel
2024–25 stats: 14.0 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 2.5 apg, 0.9 spg, 0.9 bpg, 55.1% FG, 41.0% 3P in 30 games
San Antonio: Chaz Lanier (Tennessee)
Caitie McMekin/News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Best rank: 30 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Gersh
2024–25 stats: 18.0 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 1.1 apg, 0.9 spg, 0.1 bpg, 43.1% FG, 39.5% 3P in 38 games
Toronto: Kam Jones (Marquette)
Vincent Carchietta-Imagn Images
Best rank: 30 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: LIFT
2024–25 stats: 19.2 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 5.9 apg, 1.4 spg, 0.3 bpg, 48.3% FG, 31.1% 3P in 34 games
Washington: Johni Broome (Auburn)
Andy Lyons/Getty Images
Best rank: 31 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: CAA
2024–25 stats: 18.6 ppg, 10.8 rpg, 2.9 apg, 0.9 spg, 2.1 bpg, 51.0% FG, 27.8% 3P in 36 games
Golden State: Alex Toohey (Sydney Kings)
Emily Barker/Getty Images
Best rank: 30 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Lighthouse
2024–25 stats: 11.4 ppg, 3.8 rpg, 1.3 apg, 1.4 spg, 0.8 bpg, 46.5% FG, 34.0% 3P in 32 games
Sacramento: Tyrese Proctor (Duke)
Russell Lansford-USA TODAY Sports
Best rank: 37 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: CAA
2024–25 stats: 12.4 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.2 apg, 0.8 spg, 0.1 bpg, 45.2% FG, 40.5% 3P in 38 games
Utah: Hansen Yang (Qingdao)
Jeff Haynes/NBAE via Getty Images
Best rank: 44 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Klutch
2024–25 stats: 16.2 ppg, 10.0 rpg, 2.8 apg, 0.9 spg, 2.8 bpg, 59.3% FG, 29.1% 3P in 52 games
Oklahoma City: Alex Condon (Florida)
Todd Kirkland/Getty Images
Best rank: 31 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Excel
2024–25 stats: 10.6 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 2.2 apg, 0.9 spg, 1.3 bpg, 49.3% FG, 32.8% 3P in 37 games
Chicago: Yanic Niederhauser (Penn State)
John Fisher/Getty Images
Best rank: 36 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Excel
2024–25 stats: 12.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 0.8 apg, 0.7 spg, 2.3 bpg, 61.1% FG, 9.1% 3P, 66.4% FT in 29 games
Orlando: Milos Uzan (Houston)
Robert Deutsch-Imagn Images
Best rank: 39 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: PNW
2024–25 stats: 11.4 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 4.3 apg, 0.9 spg, 0.1 bpg, 45.3% FG, 42.8% 3P in 40 games
Milwaukee: John Tonje (Wisconsin)
Matthew Stockman/Getty Images
Best rank: 41 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Excel
2024–25 stats: 19.6 ppg, 5.3 rpg, 1.8 apg, 0.7 spg, 0.2 bpg, 46.5% FG, 38.8% 3P, 90.9% FT in 37 games
Cleveland: Miles Byrd (San Diego State)
Darren Yamashita-Imagn Images
Best rank: 31 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Wasserman
2024–25 stats: 12.3 ppg, 4.4 rpg, 2.7 apg, 2.1 spg, 1.1 bpg, 38.1% FG, 30.1% 3P in 30 games
New York: Koby Brea (Kentucky)
Stacy Revere/Getty Images
Best rank: 43 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Next-Era
2024–25 stats: 11.6 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 1.3 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.3 bpg, 47.0% FG, 43.5% 3P in 36 games
Memphis: Darrion Williams (Texas Tech)
Frank Bowen IV/The Enquirer / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images
Best rank: 39 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: PNW
2024–25 stats: 15.1 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.3 spg, 0.4 bpg, 43.9% FG, 34.0% 3P in 34 games
LA Clippers: Rocco Zikarsky (Brisbane Bullets)
Photo by Josh Chadwick/Getty Images
Best rank: 43 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: ProMondo
2024–25 stats: 4.7 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 0.3 apg, 0.3 spg, 0.7 bpg, 50.0% FG, 20.0% 3P in 20 games
Utah: Michael Ruzic (Joventut)
Michael Ruzic/JOVENTUT
Best rank: 36 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: BDA
2024–25 stats: 3.4 ppg, 1.5 rpg, 0.2 apg, 0.2 spg, 0.4 bpg, 50.0% FG, 25.0% 3P in 22 games
Phoenix: Sion James (Duke)
Bob Donnan-Imagn Images
Best rank: 47 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Daniel Curtin
2024–25 stats: 8.6 ppg, 4.2 rpg, 2.9 apg, 0.8 spg, 0.3 bpg, 51.6% FG, 41.3% 3P in 39 games
Indiana: Neoklis Avdalas (Peristeri)
Jeff Haynes/NBAE via Getty Images
Best rank: 36 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Octagon
2024–25 stats: 7.7 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 1.4 apg, 0.6 spg, 0.4 bpg, 43.6% FG, 35.7% 3P in 26 games
LA Lakers: Micah Peavy (Georgetown)
Daniel Kucin Jr.-Imagn Images
Best rank: 34 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: PNW Sports Group
2024–25 stats: 17.2 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 3.6 apg, 2.3 spg, 0.5 bpg, 48.1% FG, 40.0% 3P in 32 games
Memphis: Hunter Sallis (Wake Forest)
David Yeazell-USA TODAY Sports
Best rank: 45 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: LIFT
2024–25 stats: 18.3 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 2.8 apg, 1.2 spg, 0.5 bpg, 45.7% FG, 27.7% 3P in 32 games
Orlando: Dink Pate (Mexico City Capitanes)
PABLO LOMELIN/NBAE via Getty Images
Best rank: 45 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: Roc Nation
2024–25 stats: 10.1 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 1.9 apg, 0.6 spg, 0.1 bpg, 41.0% FG, 26.0% 3P in 34 games
Cleveland: Eric Dixon (Villanova)
Jeff Haynes/NBAE via Getty Images
Best rank: 47 / Worst rank: NR
Agent: CSE
2024–25 stats: 23.3 ppg, 5.1 rpg, 1.9 apg, 0.8 spg, 0.3 bpg, 45.1% FG, 40.7% 3P in 35 games
